Wednesday, 11 December 2024

"The Green Indian Problem" by Jade Leaf Willetts


A seven-year-old boy has a problem: his body is that of a girl.

Jade, who calls himself 'Green' hates being treated like a girl. He is given dolls and made to have long hair and wear a skirt. He lives with his mother and half-sister and the dreadful Dennis who physically abuses Green's mum. He sometimes sees his unemployed Dad and two half-brothers and his religious Nan and ex-Army opera-loving Grandad, who is the only one who accepts him.

It is narrated in first-person diary-form by Green. The style uses short direct sentences which seem to be de rigueur for novels with child narrators. Concepts which might seem precocious given the age of the narrator are explained by recourse to a teacher or a dictionary, as in "Embarrassed is when you're sad and want to hide about something. Mrs R taught us that." (1989: Green)

Most of the first half of the book is spent on developing the characters and the situation. The main characters - Green and his mum - are complex, three-dimensional and hugely believable and the minor characters are also well-drawn and realistic. The setting confers, in huge dollops, further verisimilitude to the extent that I assumed (partly because the author's first name is that of the narrator) that I was reading meta-fiction.

This might also explain the plot. Nothing much happens in the first half of the book but the second half, particularly the fourth quarter, is packed with incident. This would be lopsided in novel but it can be inevitable in a fictionalised memoir. Unfortunately, it meant that the exciting events of the last few pages felt less plausible.

Selected quotes:
  • "When grown-ups say they will think about something, it just means they are saying no, but they can't be bothered to talk about it.” (1989: Les Sealey)
  • Vampires have much better hair than zombies or ghosts. It's just the rules.” (1989: Hallowe’en)
  • I like playing football, because it makes my brain go nice and quiet. When I am playing football, my brain doesn't care about anything apart from getting the ball into the goal.” ((1989: Letter)
  • Having a vagina when you're a boy is worse than your mum and dad splitting up.” (1989: The Human Body)
  • It must be weird being old. Nan said it is exactly the same as being young, except with worse teeth and hair.” (1990: Old)
  • Grandad said life goes fast, so it is important not to waste it. I think that's why he hates it when people gossip, because it is a terrible waste of time.” (1990: Old)
  • It felt the way it looks when somebody scribbles over red with blue on a picture.” (1990: Fish and Chips)
  • She was staring out of the window in the kitchen and doing zero-noise crying.” (1990: Funeral)
An important story, sensitively told.

November 2024
Published by Renard Press in 2022



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God




Tuesday, 10 December 2024

"Miss Lonelyhearts" by Nathanael West


A lyrical novella from the author of The Day of the Locust.

Miss Lonelyhearts is a male agony aunt for a newspaper who is going through a crisis. You can't read so many letters from so many unhappy people without it affecting you. His personal life is one of speakeasies and sexual frustration and he seems to identify with Christ. In one segment which seems to refer to Abraham's intended sacrifice of his son and also to the identification of Jesus as the Lamb who sacrificed himself for our sins, Miss Lonelyhearts dreams of going into a meadow with a lamb to sacrifice it; it gets away but later Miss Lonelyhearts finds it and kills it.

It has been described as ironic because Miss Lonelyhearts both offers advice and needs it, and because art is condemned within a work of art, and because Miss Lonelyhearts identifies with Christ even though he drinks illegally and fights and commits adultery. It could be read as a humorous novel but I didn't find it very funny. The overall tone is one of disenchantment. But at the bottom of his heart Miss Lonelyhearts believes that each of us is special.

There are some wonderful descriptions:
  • He entered the park at the North Gate and swallowed mouthfuls of the heavy shade that curtained its arch. He walked into the shadow of a lamp-post that lay on the path like a spear. It pierced him like a spear.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and the Dead Pan) The spear-piercing is, I presume, another reference to the crucified Christ whose side was pierced by a lance as he hung on the cross.
  • The grey sky looked as if it had been rubbed with a soiled eraser ... Only a newspaper struggled in the air like a kite with a broken spine.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and the Dead Pan)
  • He heard the wave-against-a-wharf smack of rubber on flesh.” (Miss Lonelyhearts on a Field Trip)
Selected quotes:
  • How odd the world is ... a world of doorknobs.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and the Lamb)
  • He remembered Betty. She had often made him feel that when she straightened his tie, she straightened much more.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and the Fat Thumb)
  • The stone shaft cast a long, rigid shadow on the walk in front of him. He sat staring at it without knowing why until he noticed that it was lengthening in rapid jerks ... It seemed red and swollen in the dying sun, as though it were about to spout a load of granite seed.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and Mrs Shrike)
  • He knew that in return for an ordinary number of kisses, he would have to listen to an extraordinary amount of complaining.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and Mrs Shrike)
  • You dedicate your life to the pursuit of pleasure. No over-indulgence, mind you, but knowing that your body is a pleasure machine, you treat it carefully in order to get the most out of it.” (Miss Lonelyhearts in the Dismal Swamp)
  • Crowds of people move through the street with a dream-like violence.” (Miss Lonelyhearts Returns)
  • Men have always fought their misery with dreams.” (Miss Lonelyhearts and Mrs Shrike)
The novel is referenced in The Man in the High Castle by Philip K Dick. It has been adapted into an opera and a play for the theatre and also made into a movie (three times). 

December 2024; 110 pages
First published in the USA in 1933
My edition published by Daunt Books in 2014



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God





Monday, 9 December 2024

"Burnt Out" by Jon Neal


 Mysterious things happen and nobody is quite who they seem to be in this tense psychological thriller. 

Tom's life is falling apart. Despite his childhood trauma, he has a wife and two kids. He lives with them and his brother, returned after a long period missing, in a ramshackle house on the edges of an Australian town. But since then the family has been unlucky. A gruesome discovery was followed by Tom's disappearance for a few days and he is now haunted by something he can't remember. He struggles to get his life back on track; wandering around the town to find clues to the gaps in his memory. Is a sinister someone behind the odd things that keep happening? Or is he being paranoid?

Or is he being gaslighted? If so, by whom? The obvious suspect is his spouse - and she has secrets. Or could it be his long-lost brother, now returned? Or the reclusive lodger? Or his uncle who also happens to be his boss? 

This is an author who is able to extract the maximum threat from the everyday interactions of outwardly normal people. His use of conversational ambiguity reminded me of that classic of madness and menace, The Turn of the Screw by Henry James, whose inner frame is also told in the third person but from the sole perspective of the protagonist. There were moments (such as when Tom goes to the Office in chapter 9) which I read with bated breath. The nail-biting tension was palpable.  I read as quickly as I could and yet I didn't want it to stop. 

Selected quotes:

  • "What is forged in the fire can never really be undone." (Ch 1)
  • "Who wouldn’t kill for a home and family like this?" (Ch 4)
  • "The papery trunks of the forest surrounded the rural property like an army of soldiers waiting for battle." (Ch 8)
  • "The venetian blinds had the air of razor blades about them." (Ch 9)
  •  "I think I’d been so focused on the gloom that I hadn’t dared to pick up a torch and tried to find a way out of it all." (Ch 10)


December 2024

Other books by this author:


This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God



Friday, 6 December 2024

"The Masterpiece ('L'Oeuvre)" by Emile Zola


Zola's outstanding analysis of the obsessive passion which drives  artistic creation. 

Claude Lantier is the talented leader of a group of young artists, set on challenging the established order and creating a revolution in art. But his insistence on perfection imperils his marriage, his family, his mental health and his ability to create any finished product. 

His career is contrasted with that of his lifelong friend Pierre Sandoz, a novelist who understands the artistic struggle but nevertheless becomes increasingly successful.

Sandoz is transparently a self-portrait of Zola, which Claude is an amalgam of a number of the Impressionists, whom Zola knew intimately: Cezanne, with whom Zola grew up, Manet (Claude's first masterpiece is recognisably Manet's Le Dejeuner sur l'Herbe) and others. 

Claude's artistic credo is: “To see everything, paint everything. ... life as it’s lived in the streets, the life of rich and poor, in market-places, at the races, along the boulevards, and down back streets in the slums; work of every kind in full swing; human emotions revived and brought into the light of day; the peasants, the farmyards and the countryside ... Modern life in all its aspects, that's the subject!” (Ch 2) 

Sandoz shares this ambition: 
  • Wouldn't it be wonderful to devote one's whole life to one work and put everything into it, men, animals, everything under the sun! ... the mighty universal flow of a life in which we should be a mere accident, completed, or explained by a passing dog or a stone on the roadway. The mighty All, in a word, in working order, exactly as it is, not all ups and not all downs, not too dirty and not too clean, but just as it is.” (Ch 2) 
Zola's own plan for a series of novels is articulated by Sandoz: This is the idea: to study man as he really is. not this metaphysical marionette they've made us believe he is, but the physiological human being, determined by his surroundings, motivated by the functioning of his organs. ... what is thought, in God's name, but the product of the entire body? Can they get a brain to think of by itself? What happens to the ‘nobility’ of the brain when its owner has belly-ache? ... I'm going to take a family and study each member of it, one by one, where they come from, what becomes with them, how they react to one another. Humanity in miniature, therefore, the way humanity evolves, the way it behaves.” (Ch 6)

Claude is described as “a painter remarkably gifted, but impeded by sudden, inexplicable fits of impotence.” (Ch 2) His fatal flaw is perfectionism. He was always starting afresh, spoiling the good in order to do better.” (Ch 9) 

Sandoz understands this need to make things as good as they can be. My books, for example; I can polish and revise them as much as I like, but in the end I always despise myself for their being, in spite of my efforts, so incomplete, so untrue to life.” (Ch 12) When I bring forth I need forceps, and even then the child always looks to me like a monster. ... From the moment I start a new novel, life's just one endless torture. The first few chapters may go fairly well and I may feel there's still a chance to prove my worth, but that feeling soon disappears and every day I feel less and less satisfied. I begin to say the book's no good, far inferior to my earlier ones, until I've writing torture out of every page, every sentence, every word, and the very comma's begin to look excruciatingly ugly. Then, when it's finished, when it's finished, what a relief! Not the blissful delight of the gentleman who goes into ecstasies over his own production, but the resentful relief of a porter dropping a burden that's nearly broken his back.” (Ch 9) 

The difference between the two friends is that Sandoz actually does produce books while Claude (like Leonardo da Vinci) finds it almost impossible to finish a painting. 

They dream of success, if not in this life, then in the judgement of history. An older painter, Bongrand, who has tasted fame and acclaim, warns them that even when one has reached the top of the tree, staying there can prove soul-destroying. The heights are scaled, the summits reached, and you've got to stay there. That's when the torture begins; you've drunk your excitement to the dregs and found it all too short and even rather bitter, and you wonder whether it was really worth the struggle. From that point on there is no more unknown to explore, no new sensations to experience. ... From that moment the horizon starts to empty of all the hopes that once attracted you towards it. There's nothing to look forward to but death. But in spite of that you cling on, you don't want to feel you're played out, you persist in trying to produce something, like old men persist in trying to make love, with painful humiliating results. ... If only we could have the courage to hang ourselves in front of our last masterpiece!

In the end, they wonder whether it was all worth it.
  • I wonder ... whether it might not be better to live, and die, unknown? What a cheat for us all if this glory we talk about existed no more than the paradise promised in the catechism and which even children don't believe in nowadays! We’ve stopped believing in God, but not in our own immortality!” (Ch 9)
  • Why, then, all this fuss about life if, as a man goes through it, the wind behind him sweeps away all traces of his footsteps? ... The past was but the cemetery of our illusions: one simply stubbed one's toes on the gravestones.” (Ch 11)
  • Posterity may not be the fair, impartial judge we like to think it is. We console ourselves for being spurned and rejected by relying on getting a fair deal from the future, just as the faithful put up with abomination on this earth because they firmly believe in another life where everyone should have his deserts. Suppose the artist’s paradise turns out to be as non-existent as the Catholic’s, and future generations prove just as misguided as the present one.” (Ch 11)
  • When the Earth falls to dust in space like a withered walnut, our works won't even be a speck among the rest!” (Ch 11)

This is presented in the context of what was, for then, hyper-realism. Zola is writing about the whole man, stomach and genitals as well as brains. He tells us how about the schooldays of his heroes, about their love affairs and their pub-crawls. His realism extends to dinner-party menus: “On this occasion they decided to have some ox-tail soup, grilled mullet, undercut of beef with mushrooms, raviolis in the Italian fashion, hazel-hens from Russia, and a salad of truffles, without counting caviare and kilkis as side-dishes, a glace pralinée, and a little emerald-coloured Hungarian cheese, with fruit and pastry. As wine, some old Bordeaux claret in decanters, chambertin with the roast, and sparkling moselle at dessert, in lieu of champagne, which was voted commonplace.” (Ch 10)

The work is marked by Zola's enormous empathy for the Parisian poor, those whom Hugo called Les Miserables. This impoverishment of the creative classes reminded me of New Grub Street by George Gissing

It is both absorbing and seemingly effortless. But what most impressed me is his descriptions of Paris, especially at sunset. These descriptions sound as if Monet is writing notes for a painting, they sound exactly like the perceptions of a visual artist. I can think of no other novelist who can get so inside the mind of a painter, except Mervyn Peake who was a painter.
  • What splendid sunsets they beheld during those weekly strolls. The sun accompanied them, as it were, amid the throbbing gaiety of the quays, the river life, the dancing ripples of the currents; amid the attractions of the shops, as warm as conservatories, the flowers sold by the seed merchants, and the noisy cages of the bird fanciers; amid all the din of sound and wealth of colour which ever make a city’s waterside its youthful part. As they proceeded, the ardent blaze of the western sky turned to purple on their left, above the dark line of houses, and the orb of day seemed to wait for them, falling gradually lower, slowly rolling towards the distant roofs when once they had passed the Pont Notre-Dame in front of the widening stream. In no ancient forest, on no mountain road, beyond no grassy plain will there ever be such triumphal sunsets as behind the cupola of the Institute. It is there one sees Paris retiring to rest in all her glory. At each of their walks the aspect of the conflagration changed; fresh furnaces added their glow to the crown of flames. One evening, when a shower had surprised them, the sun, showing behind the downpour, lit up the whole rain cloud, and upon their heads there fell a spray of glowing water, irradiated with pink and azure. On the days when the sky was clear, however, the sun, like a fiery ball, descended majestically in an unruffled sapphire lake; for a moment the black cupola of the Institute seemed to cut away part of it and make it look like the waning moon; then the globe assumed a violet tinge and at last became submerged in the lake, which had turned blood-red. Already, in February, the planet described a wider curve, and fell straight into the Seine, which seemed to seethe on the horizon as at the contact of red-hot iron. However, the grander scenes, the vast fairy pictures of space only blazed on cloudy evenings. Then, according to the whim of the wind, there were seas of sulphur splashing against coral reefs; there were palaces and towers, marvels of architecture, piled upon one another, burning and crumbling, and throwing torrents of lava from their many gaps; or else the orb which had disappeared, hidden by a veil of clouds, suddenly transpierced that veil with such a press of light that shafts of sparks shot forth from one horizon to the other, showing as plainly as a volley of golden arrows. And then the twilight fell, and they said good-bye to each other, while their eyes were still full of the final dazzlement.” (Ch 4)
  • Amid the December snows he went and stood for four hours a day behind the heights of Montmartre, at the corner of a patch of waste land: as a background some miserable, low, tumble-down buildings, dominated by factory chimneys, in the foreground, he set a pair of ragged urchins, a boy and a girl, devouring stolen apple in the snow” (Ch 8)
  • It was a dazzling sunset, finer than they had ever seen, a slow descent through tiny clouds which gradually turned into a trellis of purple with molten gold pouring through every mesh.” (Ch 8)
  • The tilted chess-board of diminutive roof-tops.” (Ch 8)
  • The Cité rose up before him, between the two arms of the river, at all hours and in all weather. After a late fall of snow he beheld it wrapped in ermine, standing above mud-coloured water, against a light slatey sky. On the first sunshiny days he saw it cleanse itself of everything that was wintry and put on an aspect of youth, when verdure sprouted from the lofty trees which rose from the ground below the bridge. He saw it, too, on a somewhat misty day recede to a distance and almost evaporate, delicate and quivering, like a fairy palace. Then, again, there were pelting rains, which submerged it, hid it as with a huge curtain drawn from the sky to the earth; storms, with lightning flashes which lent it a tawny hue, the opaque light of some cut-throat place half destroyed by the fall of the huge copper-coloured clouds; and there were winds that swept over it tempestuously, sharpening its angles and making it look hard, bare, and beaten against the pale blue sky. Then, again, when the sunbeams broke into dust amidst the vapours of the Seine, it appeared steeped in diffused brightness, without a shadow about it, lighted up equally on every side, and looking as charmingly delicate as a cut gem set in fine gold. He insisted on beholding it when the sun was rising and transpiercing the morning mists, when the Quai de l’Horloge flushes and the Quai des Orfèvres remains wrapt in gloom; when, up in the pink sky, it is already full of life, with the bright awakening of its towers and spires, while night, similar to a falling cloak, slides slowly from its lower buildings. He beheld it also at noon, when the sunrays fall on it vertically, when a crude glare bites into it, and it becomes discoloured and mute like a dead city, retaining nought but the life of heat, the quiver that darts over its distant housetops. He beheld it, moreover, beneath the setting sun, surrendering itself to the night which was slowly rising from the river, with the salient edges of its buildings still fringed with a glow as of embers, and with final conflagrations rekindling in its windows, from whose panes leapt tongue-like flashes.” (Ch 9)
  • It was a winter’s night, with a misty sky of sooty blackness, and was rendered extremely cold by a sharp wind blowing from the west. Paris, lighted up, had gone to sleep, showing no signs of life save such as attached to the gas-jets, those specks which scintillated and grew smaller and smaller in the distance till they seemed but so much starry dust. The quays stretched away showing double rows of those luminous beads whose reverberation glimmered on the nearer frontages. On the left were the houses of the Quai du Louvre, on the right the two wings of the Institute, confused masses of monuments and buildings, which became lost to view in the darkening gloom, studded with sparks. Then between those cordons of burners, extending as far as the eye could reach, the bridges stretched bars of lights, ever slighter and slighter, each formed of a train of spangles, grouped together and seemingly hanging in mid-air. And in the Seine there shone the nocturnal splendour of the animated water of cities; each gas-jet there cast a reflection of its flame, like the nucleus of a comet, extending into a tail. The nearer ones, mingling together, set the current on fire with broad, regular, symmetrical fans of light, glowing like live embers, while the more distant ones, seen under the bridges, were but little motionless sparks of fire. But the large burning tails appeared to be animated, they waggled as they spread out, all black and gold, with a constant twirling of scales, in which one divined the flow of the water. The whole Seine was lighted up by them, as if some fête were being given in its depths—some mysterious, fairy-like entertainment, at which couples were waltzing beneath the river’s red-flashing window-panes. High above those fires, above the starry quays, the sky, in which not a planet was visible, showed a ruddy mass of vapour, that warm, phosphorescent exhalation which every night, above the sleep of the city, seems to set the crater of a volcano.” Ch 11)
Selected quotes:
  • The girl herself was already forgotten in the thrill of seeing how the snowy whiteness of her breasts lit up the delicate amber of her shoulders.” (Ch 1)
  • She had never seen painting like it, so rugged, so harsh, so violent in its colouring; it shocked her like a burst of foul language bawled out from the steps of a gin-shop.” (Ch 1)
  • This was how they had lived from the time they were fourteen, burning with enthusiasm for art and literature, isolated in their remote province amid the dreary philistinism of a small town.” (Ch 2)
  • The lilacs she had sent him that morning embalmed the evening air with their perfume, and on the floor flecks of gilt from the picture-frame caught the last of the daylight and shone out like a galaxy of stars.” (Ch 5)
  • The urge to create ran away with his fingers, which meant that whenever he was working on one picture his mind was already at work on the next, so that his one remaining desire was to finish the task in hand as quickly as possible, as he felt his original enthusiasm ebbing away.” (Ch 8)
  • From a self-centred young man he had become an admirable father, with one great passion burning in his heart, with only one desire: to make his children's life worth living.” (Ch 10)
  • Happiness, surely, which some people said was unattainable, meant a few well-tried friendships and a haven of homely affection!” (Ch 11)
Astonishingly brilliant prose and a page-turning plot with some memorable characters. It really is a masterpiece.

December 2024; 363 pages
It was originally published in 1886
I read the 2008 Oxford World Classics paperback version translated by Roger Pearson

Other novels by Zola reviewed in this blog:


This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God


Monday, 2 December 2024

"Hag's Nook" by John Dickson Carr

 


This hugely atmospheric and beautifully written whodunnit is a cross between a Gothic novel and a crime thriller. It introduces JDC's most popular amateur sleuth Dr Gideon Fell (supposedly based on G K Chesterton) who also appears in The Hollow Man, selected in 1981 as the best locked-room mystery of all time. Hag's Nook similarly sets a seemingly impossible challenge.

In order to inherit their estate, sons of the Starberth family (who are cursed with dying of a broken neck) must spend the night of their twenty-fifth birthday in the Governor's Room of the now-derelict Chatterham Prison, once controlled by their ancestor. Suspiciuous of the possibility of foul play, Dr Fell and his associates set a watch over the prison on the relevant night. Nevertheless, a death occurs.

This murder mystery has very little in the way of forensics and it is the antithesis of a police procedural but it has a blossoming romance, an easily-fooled but gung-ho heroic sidekick, a cryptic poem, ancient curses, a clock deliberately set ten minutes wrong, plenty of convincing red herrings and a butler. What's not to like?

Thoroughly enjoyable and with strong writing throughout.

Selected quotes:

  • "There was loneliness in wandering through the grimy station, full of grit and the iron coughing of engines, and blurred by streams of hurrying commuters. The waiting-rooms looked dingy and the commuters, snatching a drink at the wet-smelling bar before train time, looked dingier still. Frayed and patched they seemed, under dull lights as uninteresting as themselves." (Ch 1)
  • "Just for a moment, he could have sworn that he had seen something looking over the wall of Chatterham prison. And he had a horrible impression that the something was wet." (Ch 2)

November 2024; 214 pages

First published in 1933 by Hamish Hamilton

My edition was published by Polygon in 2019 



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God

Saturday, 30 November 2024

"Frankie and Dot" by Rosie Radcliffe


This is a highly readable, page-turner of a book about rehabilitation and redemption.

Frankie, posh wife of a junior Government minister, is framed for arson and sent to prison. Once released, separated from her husband who is now openly in a gay relationship, rejected by her father and her son, she has to rebuild her life in a boarding-house on the Lancashire coast with ex-cellmate Sal and her partner Buster, autistic Angus the IT whizz-kid, and the mysterious Aunty Dot. On probation, she starts a cleaning job (in her previous life she employed a 'daily') and begins the slow climb to rehabilitation. But mysterious messages threaten her with being returned to prison and she starts talking to a journalist about her husband's murky past. At the same time she begins a relationship with charity manager Nik, a widower with a daughter and a mother. 

It's very readable; there's almost too much plot. For me, the best part of the book was the first quarter when the trials facing newly released and nearly destitute prisoners were carefully detailed: this section was clearly thoroughly researched and Frankie and her problems seemed very real. There was a hint that this might be an updated feminist version of the revenge classic The Count of Monte Cristo. But at the 25% first turning point the mysterious text messages arrived and we begin the subplot about the new relationship with Nik and we begin another subplot about son Justin and around the 50% mark we discover that Dot is more than she seems (Elizabeth from The Thursday Murder Club). Soon we reach the third turning point around the 75% mark when the journalist we last met half a book ago turns up trumps and ex-husband Henry's house of cards comes crashing down. The last quarter is then rattled through at a significantly faster pace.

Frankie is a brilliant protagonist and a fearfully honest narrator and most of the other characters are solidly crafted although I could never quite believe in Dot. Of the two antagonists, both male, I was impressed by Nik who was a complex character with both strengths and weaknesses but ex-husband Henry was a pantomime villain with no saving graces whatsoever which drained him of credibility.

But where the focus was on Frankie overcoming the everyday problems facing ex-cons, the writing was strong. This was a promising debut.

Selected quotes:
  • "For someone brought up as I’d been, those early weeks were not so much a rude awakening as a total tsunami of culture shock." (Ch 2)
  • "I could never get my fruit to line up. Story of my life." (Ch 11)

November 2024

Published in 2024 by The Book Guild

I read the 2024 kindle edition 



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God

Friday, 29 November 2024

"The Present and the Past" by Ivy Compton-Burnett


Flavia is the second wife of Cassius Clare and has done her best to bring up the two boys of his first wife as if they were her own, equal - except in that they are older - with her own three children. But this harmony is disturbed when Catherine, the first Mrs Clare turns asking for access to her sons. But it is the paterfamilias who has most to lose.

We are in classic ICB territory. The setting is a big house inhabited by a family supported by an independent income with no need to work and served by at least seven servants. The head of the household, Cassius, is a typical ICB domestic tyrant: demanding, self-pitying and manipulative.

The form is more or less what we would expect from ICB. It isn't in the least naturalistic. The plot is fast-paced, twisty and not very convincing. Plot devices, such as Mr Clare’s pills, are introduced just before they are needed. Unusually for an ICB book, there are paragraphs of description, such as: “Alfred Ainger was a tall, active man of forty, with a round, yellow head, a full, high-coloured face, very blue, bunched-up eyes, an unshapely nose and a red-lipped, elaborate mouth that opened and shut with a vigorous movement. His bearing carried an equal respect for his master and confidence in himself.” (Ch 2) But most of the narrative is carried by stiffly formal dialogue in which every character speaks aloud fully-formed thoughts. This allows the author to develop the characters while at the same time exploring the situation. She particularly enjoys questioning unthinking turns of phrase. For example, when an adult says, about the father, “He is devoted to you in his way.” one of the children replies: “I dare say a cat does the right thing to a mouse in its way.” (Ch 1) Or when Cassius tells his son: “It would do you good to have to face some real trouble.” and Henry (aged 8!) replies: “You know it would do us harm.” (Ch 1)

The servants form an echoing chorus, commenting upon the values held by the family from their perspective of dependent upon and yet essential to their masters if not betters. Some, like butler Ainger, value their albeit lowly place in the hierarchy. Others, like Halliday, who has been in service for nearly fifty years and never risen beyond ‘general man’, have reluctantly accepted their position. Still others, such as the Cook, maintain a core of anger that the idle family should be so much better off than they are. Why should the master attempt suicide? There is “no reason but discontent with a life that is better than ours.” (Ch 11)

But the real truth-telling is done by the children, especially Megan (aged 7) and Henry (8). Their comments are honest and direct and dissect the easy assumptions of the adults:
  • What is the good of knowing things, when you have to get older and older and die before you know everything?” (Ch 1)
  • It seems a pity ... that when two women agreed to marry Father, he did not like being married to either of them.” (Ch 3)
  • I don't think there is much to understand about Father ... When he is unhappy himself, he wants other people to be.” (Ch 3)

Of course, these are unbelievably precocious but that is not the point. As I have already mentioned, ICB is not aiming at naturalism. And three-year-old Toby's dialogue is a delight: everything is referred to himself and he takes a simple pleasure in smashing things. After he presides over a funeral service for a mole, it is predicted he will become a parson.

I can understand why people might not enjoy reading an ICB novel. It isn't just that they are set in a world that has long since passed. The mannered style is Brechtian, alienating the reader so that suspension of disbelief and immersion in the story becomes impossible. The narrative is so densely told that you have to concentrate; a passage skimmed is a passage you will have to reread. Nevertheless, characters are created, family dynamics are explored and, believe it or not, considerable humour is extracted. I find them enjoyable and impressive and, along with nouveua roman French novelist Natalie Sarraute (author of Tropismes), I can't understand why ICB's work was undersung in her own time and why she is practically forgotten today.

Selected quotes:
  • They loved her not as themselves, but as the person who served their love of themselves, and greater love has no child than this.” (Ch 1)
  • Our religion is a gloomy one. There are other and happier creeds.” (Ch 1)
  • I wanted to marry. Many women do. I wanted to have children. Many women want that too. And why should they not want it? And Cassius offered it to me. Does it need to be so much explained?” (Ch 5)
  • You are too busy admiring yourself to have any admiration left over.” (Ch 6)
November 2024; 171 pages



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God


An Ivy Compton-Burnett bibliography with links to those works reviewed in this blog:

Wednesday, 27 November 2024

"Every Man For Himself" by Beryl Bainbridge


 Winner of the 1996 Whitbread Award for Fiction; shortlisted for the 1996 Booker Prize.

This is a loss of innocence story set on the doomed Titanic. The title referring to the situation in a disaster when (presumably after 'woman and children first') everyone is entitled to do their best to save their own life. But the phrase is used in the novel by the antagonist Scurra who, having had sex with the protagonist's love interest, tells him that all is fair in matters of the heart (or rather the genitals).

The story is narrated by the protagonist, Morgan, a young male first-class passenger. Helpfully from the point of view of the novelist he is not only rich, being related to J Pierpoint Morgan whose companies controlled the White Star Line who owned the Titanic, but also an orphan whom JPM rescued from poverty, and furthermore an apprentice draughtsman who had worked on the Titanic's design; this threefold background enables him to have connections to all levels of the ship and yet to be at home nowhere. He is naive around women (there is the suggestion that he is not a virgin after experiences in brothels but he is hopeless with women 'of his own class') an one of the plot elements is his farcical wooing of Wallis. The antagonist Scurra is a mystery man who seems to move at will in all spheres; he knows some of the secrets of Morgan's background but pre-empts Morgan with Wallis.

Told in the first person past tense; nevertheless a significant part of what drives the reader onwards is not knowing whether Morgan will survive the shipwreck. It also has some superb descriptions (see Selected Quotes).

Beryl Bainbridge is author of a number of novels, those reviewed in this blog have links.

  • A Weekend with Claude (1967)
  • Another Part of the Wood (1968, revised 1979)
  • Harriet Said... (1972)
  • The Dressmaker (1973) – shortlisted for Booker Prize
  • The Bottle Factory Outing (1974) – shortlisted for Booker Prize, won the Guardian Fiction Prize
  • Sweet William (1975)
  • A Quiet Life (1976)
  • Injury Time (1977) - winner, Whitbread Prize
  • Young Adolf (1978)
  • Another Part of the Wood (revised edn) (1979)
  • Winter Garden (1980)
  • Watson's Apology (1984)
  • Filthy Lucre (1986)
  • An Awfully Big Adventure (1989) – shortlisted for Booker Prize
  • The Birthday Boys (1991)
  • Every Man for Himself (1996) – shortlisted for Booker Prize, winner of the Whitbread Prize
  • Master Georgie (1998) – shortlisted for Booker Prize
  • According to Queeney (2001)
  • The Girl in the Polka Dot Dress (2011)
Selected quotes:
  • Then the water, first slithering, then tumbling, gushed us apart ...” (Prologue)
  • My aunt held that the rich, having a heightened sense of property, were bound to feel such betrayals [theft by a servant] more keenly than the poor.” (One)
  • He did have layers, but like an onion they were all the same.” (Two)
  • I'd seen productions of Madame Butterfly on many occasions ... and always found the story unconvincing and sentimental. Who can believe that a woman, and a Japanese one at that, is capable of such passion?” (Three)
  • It's bunkum to suppose we can be touched by tragedies other than our own.” (Three)
  • I was left, a blind voyeur, scrabbling for memories to blot out the continuing din of their beastly coupling.” (Four)
  • I jerked like a rabbit in a trap as the sliver of ice slid further down my spine.” (Five)

November 2024; 214 pages
First published by Duckworth in 1996
I read the 2011 reprint of the 1997 Abacus edition



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God

Monday, 25 November 2024

"A Father and His Fate" by Ivy Compton-Burnett


 A study in domestic tyranny, told almost entirely in dialogue.

It is set in a large house inhabited by a family. Nobody (except the servants) need work, except to administer the household and the estate. They are utterly dependent upon the patriarch whose rule is arbitrary and self-serving. The story is told almost entirely in formal dialogue in which thoughts are spoken aloud.

In other words, this is classic ICB both in its traditionalist content and its modernist form. It requires careful reading: skim over a line and you're likely to need to go back. It feels stilted and yet somehow the characters build themselves and inhabit the reader's mind. 

Miles Mowbray, who is more or less the only character to speak in paragraphs rather than single lines, has three adult daughters but an 'entail' (a legal device now mostly defunct) means that it must be inherited by a male; therefore Malcolm, the adult son of Miles's brother, lives with them, learning to administer the estate. There is an unspoken assumption that Miles's daughters will remain (unmarried) in the house and be supported by Malcolm when  he inherits. The future of Malcolm's mother and brothers, who live nearby, also depends upon Malcolm's inheritance.

What could go wrong? The plot, more heavily contrived than a Shakespearean comedy, extracts every drop of potential drama and double-dealing from this set-up. Almost every plot twist was foreshadowed with heavy signposting.

Miles is the central monster. He sees himself as the master of the universe, repeatedly using the possessive 'my': my daughters, my wife, my nephew ... He is sexist: when he inadvertently quotes Christina Rossetti he denies it: Naturally I should not quote a woman. What man would?” (Ch 15) He is bullying and demanding: “You will obey me in the matter. I impose my command upon you. You are one of the women of my family and owe me obedience at its head. And you will not question it.” (Ch 8) He slanders those who would oppose him: “A set of poor, little people without perception or pity!" When  it comes to his own behaviour, he finds every excuse for selfishness and is self-pitying: “I think it is time I was spared something. I think it is indeed.” (Ch 13). Even when shown up for the man he is, he still refuses to accept any blame: "Oh, I have not so much fault to find with myself.” (Ch 13) He is what King Lear might have become had he refused to give up his Kingdom.

His wife, Ellen, tries to talk reason to him but she is ignored. He has three daughters who act as a sort of chorus commenting upon Miles's behaviour: one is highly critical, one forgiving and one tries to ignore it and get on with her own, hugely restricted life. Malcolm, the heir presumptive, is the main antagonist, sometimes abetted by redundant governess, Miss Gibbon.

There is another Greek chorus in Malcolm's possessive mother, Eliza, who sweeps in from time to time to comment upon the situation, followed by her sons Rudolf and Nigel who do a comedy double-act of acerbic asides. Eliza, is another domestic tyrant only limited by her lack of any real power. As Miles seeks to command even the thoughts of hius daughters, Eliza thinks she can speak for Malcolm, her son: “He would like his mother to be next to him ... We are not used to being separated.” (Ch 4) She insists on being told the little asides, like a teacher insisting on a note being read aloud after it has been furtively passed around the class. Malcolm resents being constantly belittled and often defies her. He is rude about her: “No one who thinks she is a goddess, can be happy ... she must always be finding that people do not agree.” (Ch 4) Ursula agrees: “I grant her superhuman qualities. Her self-esteem and insistence on support for it are above the human scale.” (Ch 4) But if those living in Miles’s household can see Eliza as a bit of a nuisance, she has destroyed the lives of her other sons, Rudolf and Nigel, turning them into non-entities. And when it comes down to it, Eliza's self-satisfied tyranny is a shadowy imitation of Miles's.

There is plenty of humour. ICB likes to question conversational cliches. For example, when Eliza is described as 'good at heart', Audrey responds: “How I should like to meet someone who was bad at heart!” (Ch 4)

Selected quotes:

  • Most of us have two views of ourselves. One our own, and one to share with other people.” (Ch 1)
  • I am awkward with women. ... Whether I fall in love with her or not, she will not with me.” (Ch 2)
  • We show the selves we are accustomed to show, and other people to expect.” (Ch 5)
  • “‘We ought not to grudge anyone his happiness, least of all our own father.’ ‘We can grudge him selfishness and folly and the indulgence of them.’” (Ch 7)
  • Things are so easy for people who have the power and must be obeyed.” (Ch 12)

November 2024; 205 pages
Originally published by Victor Gollancz in 1957
My edition the 1984 Oxford University press paperback.



This review was written by

the author of Bally and Bro, Motherdarling 

and The Kids of God


An Ivy Compton-Burnett bibliography with links to those works reviewed in this blog: