"Where do camels belong?" by Ken Thompson

 This brilliant book by an ecologist is a polemic against the division of species in 'native' and 'alien'. He shows that the idea of 'naturalness' is wrong-minded by asking where camels belong: in the middle east or in North America (where they evolved and then went extinct) or in South America (where llamas and alpacas etc represent the greatest species diversity from the camel root) or in Australia (the only country where camels are feral).  He suggests that the myth of nativeness assumes something special about this moment in time, the writer of a key text, “Elton believed firmly that species belong to wherever they happen to be right now, irrespective of length of tenure or of where they had evolved or migrated from. More than that, he believed that belonging confers rights of occupancy, that these rights extend indefinitely into the future, and that natives are morally superior to aliens.” (Ch 2)

He goes on to suggest that the talk of 'invasive' aliens is based on a very few cases where an introduction (normally by humans) caused damage to an ecosystem and that normally the arrival of aliens increases biodiversity, or would do except that “Invasion biologists worry a lot about biodiversity, but only native biodiversity; introduced species are not allowed to contribute to biodiversity. alien species can never add to biodiversity.” (Ch 12). He suggests that most examples of harm are caused because human agency alters ecosystems and this provides an opportunity for new (alien) species to thrive where the established species can't (because their environment has been changed which means that “Blaming an alien for filling the gap left by declining natives looks like shooting the messenger.” (Ch 4)

He provides oodles of evidence and gives a short (and easy-to-read) course in biogeography and ecology. He demonstrates that the evidence for alien harm is often based on dubious science: “I was going to say that ... I debunk the myth that alien species constitute the second largest global threat to biodiversity (after habitat destruction). But on reflection I think that assertion has been debunked so often ... that it no longer deserves the status of a myth, and is best described merely as a straightforward lie.” Ch 2)

He lambastes the ridiculous ideas built upon the idea of nativeness as enshrined in laws which don't take account of the fact that most 'invasions' are done without (conscious) human agency: “Nowadays, for plants with the right kind of seeds, socks are a major dispersal pathway.” (Ch 1)

It's very convincing ... and made even better by an author who can really write well and is often very funny

And, of course, it has huge implications for humanity. Who is 'entitled' to the United States: the post-Columbian immigrants or the Native Americans? And the perjorative language used again 'invasive alien' plants and animals resonate quite strongly with the way some right-wing politicians talk about human immigrants. 

Selected quotes:

• “Conservation is a value-laden activity ... ‘Nativeness’ appears to offer the prospect of unambiguous attributes that make something worth conserving; or, in the case of its absence, worth exterminating, or at least controlling. To question this approach is close to heresy.” (Introduction)
• “Species are born, and then they die. That is, is they evolve by natural selection from earlier species, and eventually they go extinct.” (Ch 1)
• “By definition species evolved in one particular spot, but later they may spread to occupy a much wider range.” (Ch 1)
• “Brown tree ... snakes climb pylons and frequently short out power lines, causing power cuts. In fact somewhere on Guam experiences a snake-related power cut about every other day.” (Ch 3)
• “The modern world is essentially a mosaic of new ‘anthropogenic biomes’” (121) This is why “in the last few thousand years, and especially in recent centuries and decades ... being a rat or a weed has turned out to be the golden ticket in life.” (Ch 7)
• “The Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 ... lists the species that cannot legally be introduced into the wild ... it now includes several species of Cotoneaster ... spread far and wide by birds, none of which can be persuaded to read Schedule 9.” (Ch 8)
• “The difficulty here is the inevitable collision between the law, which deals in black and white absolutes, and ecology, where a grey fog predominates.” (Ch 8)
• “Assisted migration of endangered species is a small step in the direction of allowing them to compete on a playing field that still slopes uphill, but slightly less steeply than before.” (Ch 10)
• “Sometimes it seems many conservationists would prefer a species to go extinct than to survive somewhere it doesn't ‘belong’.” (Ch 10)

Great fun to read ... and eye-opening.

This review was written by the author of Motherdarling  and The Kids of God January 2022; 223 pages